What Do They Value and Need

1 Role of different spiritual frameworks

Table 1
Which frameworks for spiritual guidance
N: All repondents
Yes Not sure No
In general, does spirituality serve as a guide or framework for making choices in your life? 94% 5% 1%
Do you think of the Buddhist tradition as providing you with spriritual guidance or a framework for making choices in your life? 95% 3% 1%
Do you think of the Shambhala teachngs as providing you with spiritual guidance or a framework for making choices in your life? 86% 10% 4%

Nearly all the respondents reported that spirituality serves as a guide or framework for decisions in their lives, and that the Buddhist tradition in general provided this. A substantial majority reported that the Shambhala teachings, specifically, provided such guidance.

2 Rating the usefulness spiritual guidance sources (sangha members, MIs, teachers, books)

Stacked horizontal bar chart showing the usefulness of six spiritual guidance sources as rated by member survey respondents. Each row names one source — including respected sangha members, books by or outside Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche, meditation instructors, and teachers — with bar segments in two shades of green representing "Useful" and "Not useful" shares. Rows are ordered from least to most "Useful." Respected sangha members rank highest overall, followed closely by books. Meditation instructors and formal teachers rank lower, with only just over half of respondents finding an MI to be a useful guidance resource.
Figure 1
Table 2
Usefulness of guidance sources
Source Useful Somewhat useful Not useful or don't know N
A sangha or community member whom I respect 82% 15% 4% 1,154
Books by Chögyam Trungpa 77% 18% 5% 1,152
Other books about Buddhism 77% 20% 3% 1,131
One or more teachers connected to Chogyam Trungpa, Rinpoche 71% 19% 9% 1,150
One or more teachers not connected to Chögyam Trungpa, Rinpoche 68% 22% 10% 1,117
A meditation instructor in the Shambhala community 55% 25% 20% 1,121

For this question, respondents could check as many boxes as they wished. The largest number of respondents overall said that a sangha member whom they respect was useful to them; over three quarters find books almost as useful as guidance sources, whether or not by Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche. Many respondents found teachers helpful, though only just over half of respondents overall found an MI to be helpful as a guidance resource.

3 Spiritual guidance and support sources

4 Sources of spiritual guidance and support - by generation

Faceted horizontal bar chart with four panels, one per generation cohort (70s–80s, 90s–2007, 2008–2017, 2018–2025). Within each panel, the y-axis lists six spiritual guidance sources ordered by their prevalence among the newest cohort; the x-axis shows the percentage who found that source useful. Respected sangha members rank highest in every cohort. Newer members rely more on meditation instructors relative to older cohorts, and less on books by Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche or formal teachers, which decline steadily from the earliest to the most recent generation.
Figure 2
Table 3
Sources of useful spiritual guidance and support
By year started in Shambhala
Source 70's-80's 90's-2007 2008-2017 2018-2025
A sangha or community member whom I respect 81% 80% 84% 83%
Other books about Buddhism 74% 78% 80% 77%
A meditation instructor in the Shambhala community 42% 56% 62% 68%
One or more teachers not connected to Chögyam Trungpa, Rinpoche 73% 69% 66% 60%
One or more teachers connected to Chogyam Trungpa, Rinpoche 80% 72% 69% 59%
Books by Chögyam Trungpa 86% 79% 76% 59%
Denominator is number of responses to each item. Rows are arranged from the greatest to the least difference across generations.

Respected sangha members are the most valued source of guidance across all generation cohorts. Newer members lean more toward meditation instructors and place less weight on books by Chögyam Trungpa or other formal teachers than those who entered Shambhala in earlier decades.

5 Spiritual guidance or framework - by Generation

Faceted horizontal bar chart with four panels, one per generation cohort (70s–80s, 90s–2007, 2008–2017, 2018–2025), showing the spiritual framework each cohort reports. The y-axis lists up to eight response categories derived from combining answers about spirituality, Buddhism, and Shambhala; the x-axis shows the percentage within each cohort. "Both Buddhism and Shambhala" is the most common response in every panel. Longer-tenured cohorts report higher combined Buddhism-and-Shambhala identification, while more recent joiners show a wider distribution across the categories and a larger share who are uncertain or frame spirituality differently.
Figure 3
Table 4
Which of the following best describes your spiritual framework, if any?
By year started in Shambhala
Answers 70's-80's 90's-2007 2008-2017 2018-2025
Both Buddhism and Shambhala 83% 80% 77% 67%
Buddhism, maybe Shambhala 7% 9% 6% 9%
Not sure if spirituality is a framework 3% 4% 6% 8%
Buddhism only 5% 3% 2% 5%
Shambhala, maybe Buddhism 1% 1% 3% 3%
Maybe both 0% 1% 2% 3%
Yes, spiritual framework but not Buddhism or Shambhala 1% 1% 1% 2%
No, spirituality is not a framework 0% 1% 3% 2%
Shambhala only 0% 0% 0% 1%
Denominator is number of responses to each item. Rows are arranged from the greatest to the least percentage of respondents who entered Shambhala between 2018 and 2025.

While this question attracted quite a wide variety of responses, generally a majority, or a large majority, stated that both Buddhism and Shambhala provided their spiritual framework. The longer the time respondents had been with Shambhala, the more positively they responded here. However, there was some concern about the notion that spirituality is a ‘framework’, which may have affected the total numbers answering the question more affirmatively, with more recent generations having more of an issue with this.

6 Availability of practice/study resources (paths, teachers, courses, meditation guidance)

Faceted horizontal bar chart with four panels, one per generation cohort (70s–80s, 90s–2007, 2008–2017, 2018–2025), showing the percentage of respondents in each cohort who would like more of five practice and study resources. The y-axis lists the five resources ordered by their prevalence among the newest cohort; the x-axis shows the percentage. Newer members express the strongest desire for a clear presentation of the Buddhist and Shambhala study-and-practice path — the most pronounced generational difference in the chart — while access to Buddhist teachers and courses is broadly valued across all cohorts.
Figure 4
Table 5
Want more practice and study resources
Percentage of respondents who would like more of this resource, by year started in Shambhala
Community Resource 70's-80's 90's-2007 2008-2017 2018-2025
Buddhist teachers, courses and practice resources 35% 42% 41% 48%
A clear presentation of a study and practice path for Buddhism 22% 35% 41% 46%
A clear presentation of a study and practice path for Shambhala 25% 29% 34% 38%
Shambhala teachers, courses and practice resources 24% 28% 34% 32%
Guidance for meditation practice 16% 20% 23% 27%
Denominator is number of responses to each item. Rows are arranged from the greatest to the least percentage of respondents who entered Shambhala between 2018 and 2025.

Survey respondents broadly want more access to Buddhist teachers, courses, and practice resources. The most pronounced generational difference is around having a clear presentation of the study and practice path — newer members express considerably more interest in this for both Buddhism and the Shambhala teachings than those who entered in earlier decades.

7 Availability of community resources (peer support, leadership/teacher/MI training)

Table 6
Availability of community resources
Resource I have what I need I would like more of this I am not interested at this time
A supportive group of fellow practitioners 63% 27% 10%
Leadership training 34% 21% 45%
Teacher training 31% 23% 45%
Meditation instructor training 41% 20% 38%

8 Availability of community resources (peer support, leadership/teacher/MI training) by Generation

Table 7
Availability of community resources
Percentage of respondents who would like more of this resource, by year started in Shambhala
Community resource 70's-80's 90's-2007 2008-2017 2018-2025
A supportive group of fellow practitioners 24% 30% 28% 28%
Meditation instructor training 13% 21% 25% 24%
Leadership training 13% 23% 27% 21%
Teacher training 15% 28% 30% 19%
Denominator is number of responses to each item. Rows are arranged from the greatest to the least percentage of respondents who entered Shambhala between 2018 and 2025.

Overall, and particularly among the most recent generation, the largest number of respondents reported that they would like more access to Buddhist teachers, courses and practice resources. Generations differed most in their interest in having a clear presentation of the study and practice path, particularly for Buddhism, but also for the Shambhala teachings. Those newer to Shambhala had more interest in this than those who entered in earlier decades. Overall, the responses show that many participants would like better access to such resources.

9 Opportunities that would enhance experience (social issues, body practice, arts, diversity, cost, childcare, etc.)

Table 8
Opportunities that would enhance my experience
Percentage of respondents who would like more of this resource, by year started in Shambhala
Oportunity 70's-80's 90's-2007 2008-2017 2018-2025
More movement and body practice opportunities 21% 23% 28% 36%
More exploration of how meditation relates to social issues 26% 29% 30% 32%
More study and practice options with other Tibetan teachers 38% 36% 40% 31%
Study and practice opportunities that are less expensive 24% 23% 27% 27%
More arts and creativity related activities 23% 23% 27% 27%
More convenient or more frequent in-person activities 16% 17% 28% 26%
More opportunities for interacting with the wider local community 20% 19% 27% 25%
More in-person social activities 17% 15% 16% 20%
Other (please specify) 20% 22% 16% 14%
More activities focused on people between the ages of 18 and 34 9% 6% 9% 9%
More child care availability during programs and meditation sessions 4% 3% 5% 5%
Denominator is number of responses to each item. Rows are arranged from the greatest to the least percentage of respondents who entered Shambhala between 2018 and 2025.

Among the 228 open text responses, the most frequent theme mentioned was Vajrayana study and how to access this, either for existing or for aspiring students. The second most frequent concerned more online offerings, particularly hybrid ones. There were calls for more practice or activity around societal action, environmental issues or generally benefiting others. There were also requests for teachers who themselves had studied with Trungpa Rinpoche, and for visiting teachers and Rinpoches. An equal number were wanting to study with the Sakyong, to have greater recognition for him in Shambhala or have a lineage teacher replace him.

Examples…

I think more clarity about how Shambhalians can become vajrayana students would be helpful — how to get pointing out instruction, Ngondo guidance, Abhishekas, etc. within Shambhala Intl….

Social meditation; having a small group of other practitioners for more intensive mutual support

In order of frequency, other major categories of responses included more access to knowledgeable teachers.

Examples…

TEACHERs to lead Shambhala and bring in a diverse, younger membership.

More teachings from the wider Trungpa related diaspora.

More online offerings:

Examples…

More accessible opportunities, especially more hybrid offerings with a focus on connecting online-only members to the Sangha

Online Werma assembly

More sense of inclusion and accessibility:

Examples…

The level 1 — 5 training takes up almost every minute of my weekend that I’m not sleeping. I work for capitalism the rest of the week and I don’t end up with time to grocery shop or do laundry on the level 1 — 5

I feel we need to open our doors to young people: 18 — 40 soon.

A clearer relationship to a lineage teacher, including Sakyong Mipham:

Examples…

Acknowledgement of the years Sakyong Mipham Rinpoche has taught in Shambhala in courageously unfolding the teachings of his father.

Connection to a living Lineage holder ie Sakyong Mipham Rinpoche

More interrelationship between branches of the lineage that were created and/or inspired by CTR regardless of whether they are within the bounds of Sh Int’l, DMC, KCL, Casa Werma, Ocean, other seeds that have sprouted and grown…

Enhanced local community experiences and support for groups and centres:

Examples…

More strategic help for small Centers, so they can run more sustainably and allow for dedicated community members to contribute more richly and avoid burnout.

I’m mostly focused on governance and keeping the doors open at our center. So, anything related to that is welcome. For example, a governance template for small, medium and large centers that includes steps to take for long-term financial stability and less or no dependence on volunteers.

And more attention to the application of teachings to daily life:

Examples…

More teachers speaking about gender, sexisms and feminism

Bring the natural world into our path of wakefulness

10 Changes that would enhance experience (vision clarity, conflicts, past problems, diversity, safety)

Table 9
Changes that would enhance my experience
Percentage of respondents who would like more of this resource, by year started in Shambhala
Change 70's-80's 90's-2007 2008-2017 2018-2025
More clarity about the current community vision 44% 44% 45% 37%
More diversity in the community 25% 28% 31% 29%
More sense of connection with others 24% 28% 29% 26%
More acknowledgement of past problems 20% 22% 22% 19%
Teachers who are more knowledgeable 14% 13% 10% 16%
Fewer internal conflicts 27% 21% 21% 14%
Less feeling at risk for harm 4% 7% 6% 3%
Denominator is number of responses to each item. Rows are arranged from the greatest to the least percentage of respondents who entered Shambhala between 2018 and 2025.

The largest portion of respondents cited more clarity about the current community vision as the change that would enhance their experience in Shambhala. However, there was a notable difference across generations: more respondents who entered Shambhala between 2008 and 2017, arguably the rising generation of leaders in the community, selected this as a desired change.

Around 39% of this cohort also felt that more diversity in the community and more sense of connection with others would be desirable. Acknowledgement of past problems and fewer internal conflicts were still an issue for some, though for slightly fewer of the most recent entrants.

197 respondents offered additional open text answers to this question. The largest category of answers related to Sakyong Mipham and fall out from the split in the community.

Examples…

Any show of interest in providing for vajrayana students who were left abandoned by Shambhala after the scandal led to a separation from the Sakyong.

Reintegration of the Sakyong lineage with Shambhala.

A well-communicated path of healing and closure from the separation with the Sakyong.

The next three largest categories had an equal number of responses and concerned leadership quality, teacher quality and desire for engaged Buddhism.

Examples…

To perceive that Shambhala central leadership is genuinely manifesting the fruit of the teachings in its approach and action

Better leadership that’s equipped with skill sets in managing a nonprofit

More engagement in governance and non-hierarchical ‘shared leadership’ opportunities for the community

Teachers who are able to bring their knowledge of the dharma to the world of 2026 and beyond. Not stuck in the paradigms of the past.

More involvement in peaceful social activism